Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
Blogs > pal334 > A TIME TO SHARE |
Just sharing
|
Senior Moderator,,,,,, 11/15/2011 1:42 am,,,,,,,,,, banned ****** for...well, for being an asshole[/B].(my note: Where does that fall in the rules?) came into the room, lurked for a couple minutes then, addressing the ladies in the group, said that we were all too old to be daddy's girls. while there was some irritation-based comments, some of us were trying to explain that roleplay knows no age. so we thought he left but he made another comment, and we tried to give him more stern explanations. he laughed at us, so i banned him. it was me, **,***, and *** in the room for sure.
| ||
|
Excerpt from room rules on the main page of Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) In addition, any member pulling members from this room to other rooms, and/or mentioning other groups, rooms, topical, or regional groups by name, other than Kitten's Refuge (DG's Dungeon), with also be banned immediately. Tickle a Joe (aka Joefielder62) Female Room Member replies on 7/17/2014 12:27 pm: cutie id luv 2 tickle ur honey pot...u should cum play n the taboo room with me. the guys would luv u Female Room Member replies on 7/18/2014 11:57 am: id luv 2 tickle my way up those sexy legs with my tongue and not stop til i reach ur sweet lil cunny The question is since the banning thread in Best of the Best is full of folks being banned for advertising other rooms, is this posting member in favor with the Room Owner and did not get banned, or is it sloppy thread reviews, since there is no other posts in this thread?
| ||
|
Excerpt from room rules on the main page of Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) In addition, any member pulling members from this room to other rooms, and/or mentioning other groups, rooms, topical, or regional groups by name, other than Kitten's Refuge (DG's Dungeon), with also be banned immediately. Tickle a Joe (aka Joefielder62) Female Room Member replies on 7/17/2014 12:27 pm: cutie id luv 2 tickle ur honey pot...u should cum play n the taboo room with me. the guys would luv u Female Room Member replies on 7/18/2014 11:57 am: id luv 2 tickle my way up those sexy legs with my tongue and not stop til i reach ur sweet lil cunny The question is since the banning thread in Best of the Best is full of folks being banned for advertising other rooms, is this posting member in favor with the Room Owner and did not get banned, or is it sloppy thread reviews, since there is no other posts in this thread? Become a blog watcher sweet_vm
| ||
|
| ||
|
[group_post 2939194] Last Issuance was ,,,,, to another MODERATOR,,, 12/10/2013. Seems that Female Room Members are excluded from this award. Maybe a rename to “Love Me Moderators” would be in order? ROOM OWNER,,,,, 7/30/2014 5:58 am I nominate MODERATOR1. Very active, keeps the threads hopping, very loyal to DG. MODERATOR1 replies on 7/30/2014 9:27 pm: Thank you ROOM OWNER MODERATOR2 replies on 8/1/2014 6:17 am: MODERATOR1 certainly keeps things hopping and the money rolling in! /////////////////////////////////////// ROOM Owner,,,,,,,,,, 7/31/2014 3:10 am I nominate MODERATOR2!! She goes above and beyond for Daddys Girls, everyday!! She spends countless hours in our chat room along with doing the thank less task of proofing the threads!! Thanks for all you do MODERATOR2!!! MODERATOR2 replies on 7/31/2014 5:53 am: Oh, wow, ROOM OWNER! I was just proofing the threads and saw your kind words! MODERATOR1 replies on 7/31/2014 9:01 am: woohooo way to go MODERATOR2
| ||
|
Pal for a blog that they said would go away very quickly and no one would read it .. It sure has been doing very well hasn't it! I mean this thread.. hugsssssssssssss V Become a blog watcher sweet_vm
| ||
|
This blog has since it started in Nov 26, 2012 reached 200312 Views!!! That is in slightly less than 21 months!!! It shows a lot of interest from site members into the workings and abuse in Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly). Just so you know, that is an average of 600 to 800 views every single day. I won’t use names, since these pissants would use any opportunity available , as they have in the past by using lies about my posts to complain to the site. But in general, I hope the ROOM OWNER and the pissant SENIOR MODERATOR, 61 M finally realize that this blog will not go away. And before they say it, no, there is minimal effort expended here. Most of the information posted comes from their “loyal” staff and room members. SO thank you all for your support. Lets see when the next milestone of 250,000 happens
| ||
|
[image]
| ||
|
[image] Become a blog watcher sweet_vm
| ||
|
"Well, it continues. The lady in the above post was banned. A member with 2 years of room membership , and very popular with room members. It seems that interpretation of rules is very elastic. Must have been a rubber stamp of the Senior Moderators room. Be nice to the moderators, Tow the line or your “outta there? Moderator,,,, 1/9/2013 11:51 am,,,, Banned anna harbor for disrespect anna_harbor (23F) should I paste your query here ***??? [11:19 AM EST] This was after she asked if i'd had an answer to my query. I asked what query and she said the one i posted about her. The only post i have made about her is the one above. I realize she will be back because she always is but i do not feel it necessary to just accept her abuse. Senior Moderator,,, 1/9/2013 12:12 pm,,,, Banned anna_harbor repeatedly mod bashing enough is enough dont need the repeated room drama caused when she does"
| ||
|
More Revisionist History. ( My Note;Below is an example of Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) Management going through and revising things I did as a Moderator, to “Prove” that they made a Good decision to ban me. Very stupid of them, since I did keep the information when I realized there complete lack of honesty and integrity) pal334 9/6/2012 3:37 pm Banned: ******* (52M) “Female room member” luv it sweety [ 2:34 PM EDT] ********(52M) check my cam and i will [ 2:36 PM EDT] ( My note; After I was banned , the Sister Room Owner started going through Best of the Best unbanning folks. Even though the bans were previously reviewed and approved by Room Management, including Sister Room Owner. ) Sister Room Owner replies on 10/19/2012 10:29 pm: unbanned~ obviously in a conversation with Female Room Member before asking for cam. (note: made up reason this Sister Room Owner was not in the room at time of “incident”.This was done to many bans I did, a way for the Sister Room Owner to Justify part of the Ban decision. It should be noted that this person and The Room Owner where providing me positive feed back prior.)
| ||
|
More Revisionist History. ( My Note;Below is an example of Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) Management going through and revising things I did as a Moderator, to “Prove” that they made a Good decision to ban me. Very stupid of them, since I did keep the information when I realized there complete lack of honesty and integrity) pal334 9/6/2012 3:37 pm Banned: ******* (52M) “Female room member” luv it sweety [ 2:34 PM EDT] ********(52M) check my cam and i will [ 2:36 PM EDT] ( My note; After I was banned , the Sister Room Owner started going through Best of the Best unbanning folks. Even though the bans were previously reviewed and approved by Room Management, including Sister Room Owner. ) Sister Room Owner replies on 10/19/2012 10:29 pm: unbanned~ obviously in a conversation with Female Room Member before asking for cam. (note: made up reason this Sister Room Owner was not in the room at time of “incident”.This was done to many bans I did, a way for the Sister Room Owner to Justify part of the Ban decision. It should be noted that this person and The Room Owner where providing me positive feed back prior.) Become a blog watcher sweet_vm
| ||
|
Pal at the end of the day, I never did know what they were thinking when they unbanned all those people you banned.. Trouble makers will never changed. Always come back in for more trouble. I am just glad I do not belong to either room anymore. They told me they were my friend needing my help and in the end they were just using me! This group of people are users! They can have it!! Never will I return back to those two rooms again. hugs V
| ||
|
Goes out to the Moderator that has visited 10 times since the post dated 9/24/2014 6:40 pm. You need not worry, unlike Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly), I do not revise history. Oh, I forgot, you are the one that fabricated information and got me banned several times with lies that you sent to the Site Management. Now that I think of it and I check more, your visits do seem to coincide with my new posts in the rest of my blog. Are you disappointed you have not found anything to "report"? Always remember, I have a copy of everything I post, so beware
| ||
|
Goes out to the Moderator that has visited 10 times since the post dated 9/24/2014 6:40 pm. You need not worry, unlike Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly), I do not revise history. Oh, I forgot, you are the one that fabricated information and got me banned several times with lies that you sent to the Site Management. Now that I think of it and I check more, your visits do seem to coincide with my new posts in the rest of my blog. Are you disappointed you have not found anything to "report"? Always remember, I have a copy of everything I post, so beware Become a blog watcher sweet_vm
| ||
|
Now I know what is causing the situation that I posted on 10/4/2014 2:46 pm. Very interesting, yet not surprising at all. I will compile more details and post specifics in a couple days. [/SIZE]
| ||
|
Now I know what is causing the situation that I posted on 10/4/2014 2:46 pm. Very interesting, yet not surprising at all. I will compile more details and post specifics in a couple days. ] Become a blog watcher sweet_vm
| ||
|
It looks like some wholesale changes have occurred in the Moderator and Management staff at Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) again. What is amazing is the number of Senior Moderators and the Sister Room Owner that are gone. As best I can see it ,there has been a purge of SIX (6) of them in the last week or two. I have no indication that these were mass resignations, or was it in fact a purging. If you read back ,the Room Owner has already given the axe to Two people that strongly supported the room, each supported him for several years each. Now with the departure of the former Sister Room Owner, it seems to have happened again The Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) seems to have disassociated itself from the Sister Room, (eliminating all mention of it on its entry board)the Room Owner does not show as a Moderator there anymore either. And the former Sister Room no longer mentions its association with Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) either. One of the purged Moderators was advertised as the “Entertainment Director” up until this purge and virtually single handed keep the rooms discussion board active. What a reward for dedication. Another Moderator that was purged was nominated by the Room Owner for the honor of the Croix de daddy 8/23/2014 8:08 am Room Owner: I nominate Moderator!! is as loyal as they come!! Fun, witty, sexy, a perfect Daddys Girl!!!! (I guess the Room Owner was his usual hypocritical self with that nomination). I am sure more will be forth coming. But for the readers that have been following this blog, it is even more apparent ,I think the underhanded way that the Moderators to this room are being used. If the “loyal” Moderators are treated this way, how are the Room Members being treated? Stay tuned for more
| ||
|
[image]
| ||
|
It looks like some wholesale changes have occurred in the Moderator and Management staff at Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) again. What is amazing is the number of Senior Moderators and the Sister Room Owner that are gone. As best I can see it ,there has been a purge of SIX (6) of them in the last week or two. I have no indication that these were mass resignations, or was it in fact a purging. If you read back ,the Room Owner has already given the axe to Two people that strongly supported the room, each supported him for several years each. Now with the departure of the former Sister Room Owner, it seems to have happened again The Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) seems to have disassociated itself from the Sister Room, (eliminating all mention of it on its entry board)the Room Owner does not show as a Moderator there anymore either. And the former Sister Room no longer mentions its association with Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) either. One of the purged Moderators was advertised as the “Entertainment Director” up until this purge and virtually single handed keep the rooms discussion board active. What a reward for dedication. Another Moderator that was purged was nominated by the Room Owner for the honor of the Croix de daddy 8/23/2014 8:08 am Room Owner: I nominate Moderator!! is as loyal as they come!! Fun, witty, sexy, a perfect Daddys Girl!!!! (I guess the Room Owner was his usual hypocritical self with that nomination). I am sure more will be forth coming. But for the readers that have been following this blog, it is even more apparent ,I think the underhanded way that the Moderators to this room are being used. If the “loyal” Moderators are treated this way, how are the Room Members being treated? Stay tuned for more Become a blog watcher sweet_vm
| ||
|
This pattern is what he has been doing over the years.. For all the time you spend with this group this is how you are treated.. hugsssss V Become a blog watcher sweet_vm
| ||
|
On 8/16/2014 4:25 pm we reached a goal of 200312 views and here we are two months ,and 50,000 views later, the next milestone of over 250,000 views has been reached!! At the risk of sounding selfish, I think this is quite an accomplishment since the start of this blog on 11/26/2012 7:34 pm, less than two years ago. To me it shows the continued interest in the abuses and misdeeds in Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) A special thanks to all those that are contributing information for this blog, and of course to all the loyal viewers and visitors. ROOM OWNER, never fear you did not purge deep enough . As long as there is interest in this subject, we will carry on. Next goal is of course 300,000 views, any guesses how soon that will be?
| ||
|
On 8/16/2014 4:25 pm we reached a goal of 200312 views and here we are two months ,and 50,000 views later, the next milestone of over 250,000 views has been reached!! At the risk of sounding selfish, I think this is quite an accomplishment since the start of this blog on 11/26/2012 7:34 pm, less than two years ago. To me it shows the continued interest in the abuses and misdeeds in Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) A special thanks to all those that are contributing information for this blog, and of course to all the loyal viewers and visitors. ROOM OWNER, never fear you did not purge deep enough . As long as there is interest in this subject, we will carry on. Next goal is of course 300,000 views, any guesses how soon that will be? Become a blog watcher sweet_vm
| ||
|
In view of the above mass deletion of Moderators (reasons unknown) and change in affiliation with the sister room ( my post dated 10/11/2014 8:20 pm)the following was observed. There are now 10 Moderators showing for Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly). It seems since the “Entertainment Director” Moderator is gone, posting by Moderators on the Discussion Board of Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) is almost nonexistent. Seems the Moderator support is waning more and more. Below are the Moderator posting statistics for the period 1 October through 24 October 2014 (the approximate period of Moderator change). 5 MODERATORS have NO POSTS in Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) 2 MODERATORS have 2 Posts in Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) 2 MODERATORS have 11 plus posts in Daddy's Girls! (AGE Friendly) (Does not include the Room Owner). One actually has more posts in a rival room. Room Owner, Has only 6 Posts in the room discussion board during this period. And has stopped Greeting new members in the [group_post 2886797] thread So it seems of the 10 Moderators, 8 including the Room Owner are showing minimal to no support of the discussion board. More problems in Paradise It seems. Stay tuned
| ||
|
Well, at least the Room Owner is starting to post in the discussion boards again since my post 10/24/2014 5:23 pm. The odd thing is when you look at the new members posts since that date, of the four women that posted, one was only a member long enough to post into the newbie thread and then deleted her profile. And one other is using a stolen internet picture. Odd they were the ones greeted by the Room Owner? There seems now shame in the way "activity" is illustrated, I would think.
|
Become a member to create a blog